Phase II (2019-'21) |
---|
II P1: FIRE Induced Element Cycling II P2: Nutrient cycling & vegetation II P3: Microorganisms & soil structure II P4: Linking bioturbation with fluxes II P5: Erosion-Climate-Vegetation coupling (SECCO) II P6: Bio-Geomorphology II P7: Biota, fracture, thresholds II P8: Stress constrained landscape modeling II P9: Bridging timescales with modeling II P10: Landscape evolution from Thermochronology II P11: DeepES - Weathering Geochemistry II P12: DeepES - Microbial element cycling II P13: DeepES - Geophysical Imaging II P14: DeepES - Microbial activity II P15: DeepES - Geomicrobiology II A1: Plant available water storage II A2: Bioweath |
Phase I (2016-'18) |
---|
I P1: Plant Traits and Decomposition I P2: Coupled Modelling I P3: Biofilms & Weathering I P4: Sediment storage & Connectivity I P5: Crustweathering I P6: Root Carbon I P7: Paleoclimate I P8: Imaging of Weathering front I P9: Sediment Transport I P10: Phosphorus solubilization I P11: Green & Grey world I P12: Biogenic Weathering I P13: Microbiological Stabilization I A3: Carbon & Nutrient Fluxes |
Investigator Names and Contact Info:
Chilean Collaborators Involved:
PhD:
supervisor: Jun. Prof. Dr. D. Scherler, co-supervisor: Prof. J. Braun
MSc:
supervisor: Jun. Prof. Dr. D. Scherler, co-supervisor: Prof. J. Braun
Project summary:
The proposed project is a continuation of our ongoing effort to quantify the effect of biota on bedrock river incision over geological time scales. Within the first phase of the EarthShape SPP, we hypothesized that biota, and specifically the presence of soils and vegetation, influence the process of river incision, and thus landscape evolution, primarily by modulating the magnitude-frequency distribution of flood events. We are testing this hypothesis by combining a stochastic-threshold stream power model of bedrock river incision with cosmogenic nuclide-derived denudation rates and a large dataset of daily discharge records. In the second phase, we want to extend our research towards the hillslopes and focus on how biotic and abiotic processes control discharge generation and the magnitude of erosion thresholds. The most basic and presumably important threshold in rivers is the discharge needed to mobilize the sediments that mantle most riverbeds. All else equal, mobilizing large grains requires greater discharge compared to small grains. Therefore, besides discharge distributions, both bedrock lithology and fracture spacing, which sets the initial grain size, and weathering processes, which reduce grain sizes during hillslope residence, ought to be important. We will tackle this issue by (1) quantifying spatial gradients in fracture density, regolith thickness, and sediment size using field observations, (2) quantifying the spatial variability of hillslope denudation rates using cosmogenic nuclides, and (3) testing the relative strengths of abiotic and biotic controls on landscape evolution with numerical simulations. In the modeling part, we strive to integrate existing theory with various kinds of observational data from all other EarthShape projects. We will further test the possibility of self-organization in landscape evolution that emerges through interaction and feedbacks between topography, fracture spacing, chemical weathering, and biota. The outcome of this research shall provide us with quantitative estimates of how sensitive bedrock river incision is to biota, and how we can potentially identify a biotic signature in actual landscapes.